User52048_5_t Adam Waldman - Long Island REALTOR®
View all real estate listings in your area:
Members: 122,540 - 2,775 Online Now  Login
 

 While reading a recent post entitled Would YOU Say Something? by Kathy Passarette, a Long Island Staging Professional, it got me to thinking about REALTORS®, photography and MLS photos.  In Kathy's post, she was questioning whether or not to mention to a local REALTOR® that the photos of a particular listing on MLS didn't show the home in the best light.

  

Being a Long Island REALTOR®, I know that it is a challenge to get people to pay a professional stager to prepare their home for sale on Long Island.  However, even if we cannot convince the homeowners to pay for staging, we should at least take it upon ourselves to have them get their home into "show-ready" condition before photographs are taken for MLS and all marketing materials.

 

Some homeowners do whatever it takes to get the home into "show-ready" condition, and yet the photos that potential buyers see still don't do the home any justice, and there is a simple explanation for this.  Many REALTORS® take their own photos of their listings instead of letting a professional photographer take them.  In my opinion, this is a mistake.  Of course, there is always an exception to any rule, and there may be a number of REALTORS® out there that take outstanding photos.  Generally speaking though, this is not the case.

 

As REALTORS®, we can clearly see the pitfalls that people make when they decide to sell their home on their own.  After all, we are professionally trained to do what a FSBO may only do once or twice in a lifetime.  How can they possibly be as effective as we are when marketing their home?  The answer is...they can't!  This is not to say that all FSBO's are doomed to fail, or that they all will receive much lower offers than they would if they used a REALTOR®, although the statistics do show that this is true in most cases.

 

Can a FSBO sell their home on their own?  Yes, some of them can.  Can a REALTOR® take professional looking photos of a home? Some of us can, but most of us don't.  Our job is to market a home, and while photography is part of marketing a home properly, it is not something that we do often enough to qualify us as professionals. 

 

I'd like to share with you some examples of homes photographed by REALTORS® and also by a professional photographer.  These are not exaggerated examples for effect.  Both of these homes were previously listed and expired.  When I took over each listing, I had the homes photographed by a professional photographer, who also put together the virtual tour.  The cost for the total package for each was less than the cost to run a photo ad in the local newspaper for two days.

 

REALTOR                                                                         PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER

Home # 1

Home # 2

 

As you can see, there is a noticeable difference between the photos.  The professional photographer brought the homes to life, and made each room feel very large, while the photos by REALTORS® did very little to show the homes in their true light.  This doesn't mean that they are not good at what they do.  It simply shows that there are people that are better at certain things, and there is no shame in delegating. 

 

It is widely accepted that the most effective executives are the ones that surround themselves with people that are better than them at certain aspects of their job.  Just like a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, a marketing campaign is only as strong as its weakest link.  Arguably, the most important part of the marketing campaign (outside of price) is visual.  If the photos that you are using are not the best that they can be, then you are placing yourself, and more importantly, your homeowner, at a disadvantage. 

 

So why do REALTORS® choose not to hire a professional photographer?  There are two main reasons that I can think of, and they are as follows:

[1] COST - Why pay for something that you can do for free?  I'm sure that most FSBO's would agree with this statement.

 

[2] CONTROL - Many REALTORS® have trouble delegating because they feel that they can do it better themselves.  Again, the FSBO's are probably in full agreement on this one.

 

 We are in a competitive marketplace right now.  Many homes are expiring from the market each day.  Do you want your listings to be the ones that sell, or the ones that sit and eventually expire?  One simple solution to making your listings stand out is to have them be the most appealing looking homes on MLS.  By the way, both of the examples listed above ended up selling for very close to asking price, in a relatively short amount of time, in a declining market.

 

If you're looking for a point of differentiation when going on a listing appointment, tell the homeowners that you'll be hiring a professional photographer to take pictures of their home.  The odds are that your competition won't be making that same promise.

 

 
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: The Art Of Marketing You
Post is included in group: RE/MAX Active Rain Bloggers
Post is included in group: Real Estate Rookie
Post is included in group: Dedicated Bloggers

85 Comments on Do You Hire Professional Photographers?

Having access to a professional photographer, or even making friends with one, will add value to your listings if you can get him or her to help you take pictures of your properties.  Many of our agents here switched to professional photographers and saw a noticeable difference in the way clients perceived there listings.

Listings are on the Internet now, including all their photos which are viewable on large screens.  Draw potential buyers in.

03/25/2008 11:18 AM by PMZ Real Estate


One thing that a professional can do is make a room look bigger that it is.  Some of us agents have the same capabilities.  But, I have found, one thing that turns a buyer off of a property is when they look on-line at photo's or in my office MLS, when we get to the home and the home doesn't look like the pictures...

Truth in advertising includes pictures in the consumers eyes.

03/25/2008 11:25 AM by William Feela Owner/Broker North Branch,MN (Whispering Pines Realty)


PMZ:  You hit on the most important factor, which is that the photos are all over the Internet as the home is being marketed.  If the photos are not appealing, buyers will eliminate the home without ever seeing it in person.  Thanks for your comment.

WILLIAM:  The photographer that I use does his best to capture the true dimensions of the room.  This is not always easy, as they have limited space to work with to make sure that the whole room is included in the photo.  In the case of the photos above, the agent photos actually made the rooms appear smaller than they are.  My job is to make the home appealing so that buyers will want to see it.  I don't try to trick anyone into thinking anything.  The fact that I also include a virtual tour lessens the possibility of the home not being what it appears to be in photos.  Thanks for your comment.

03/25/2008 11:40 AM by Adam Waldman - Long Island REALTOR® (RE/MAX Best)


It wasn't until I joined AR that I realized there was such a thing as a professional photographer for real estate. I am not a professional photographer I am a hobbyist. I do all my own photographs, not because I wouldn't hire a professsional, I just haven't thought about it before.

I am sure it would actually be more economical to hire a professional in most cases. For the average size home (under 2000 sqft.) I probably take 100 photographs at different times of the day. This does not include photos of the neighborhood and its amenities. (Another 100 to 200 photos, Thank God for digital cameras!) Then I go home look at all of the photos, make selections, put together the presentation folders, brochures and visual tour. I doubt they are among the professional grade, but I get great feedback and compliments on my presentations.

I would definitely search out a professional (now that I know they exist) for homes are out of my expertise as far as volume and details that are difficult to capture, these usually being luxury homes and historic homes.

03/25/2008 11:44 AM by JoEllen Stranger-Thorsen, Lake County, FL (Catherine Hanson Real Estate, Inc.)


I agree, professional photographers have the equipment and the knowledge to produce good photos. A wide angle lens can cost as much as the average agent would pay for a digital camera. Composition and lighting can make all the difference in the world.

Good Post!

03/25/2008 11:45 AM by Michael Setunsky (Michael's Commercial LLC)


Most agents use a point and shoot rather than a DSLR camera.  My flash alone cost $400 and I do have the wide angle lens to get the entire room into a shot as well.  I think it's one of those things, if you are good at it do it, if not hire it out.

Some agents have great taste and can stage their properties successfully on their own, most can't.  Me, I hire a stager.

My only concern with pros is that they can overphoto shop a photo.  I mean some add blue sky and green grass in there. If the lawn is dead, it should be dead in the photo. Showing up to a house with green grass in a photo and dead in real life...not a good impression to start the buying process with.  Photos need to reflect as much as possible the true nature of the home.

03/25/2008 11:57 AM by Melina Tomson, M.S. Salem Oregon Real Estate Specialist (Tomson Burnham, llc)


Adam - Excellent point!  I wan t my listings sold, and sold fast.  And, I want my sellers to be happy with the presentation and marketing.

03/25/2008 12:02 PM by Twin Cities Minnesota Real Estate - Marzena Melby (Counselor Realty, Inc.)


Adam that is an amazing illustration of your point. I have to admit I don't hire a professional but my assistant takes all my pictures and she does a decent job. You are right though, the photos can make or break the presentation.

I am wondering why you are not using a feedburner account. You do a fantastic job with your blog and don't have a means to let consumers subscribe?

03/25/2008 12:32 PM by Bill Gassett Metrowest Massachusetts Real Estate (RE/MAX Executive Realty)


Adam - This is a terrific post, my friend.  I typically haven't used a professional photographer, but you have made me re-think my position on this.

03/25/2008 02:07 PM by Jason Crouch, Broker - Austin Texas Real Estate (Austin Texas Homes, LLC)


Im glad somebody posted a blog about this.I totally agree..Does anyone know how much it costs to have a home professionally photographed?

03/25/2008 02:10 PM by Geno D'Angelo (Coldwell Banker Northern Lakes)


I don't hire a professional because the cost (in my area) truly outweighs the benefit. I have (like William above) taken buyers to see houses where the photos were glorious professional shots, and they were so disappointed in the actual house. When it came time to list their house, they wanted my photos...because they are "real". Just my 2 cents.

03/25/2008 02:32 PM by Kelly Sibilsky (Licensed Through Professional Referrals, Inc.)


The difference in the pictures say it all.  There is no comparison whatsoever.

03/25/2008 02:41 PM by Latonia Parks (Keller Williams Realty)


I am so picky on my photo's, but KW has a listing service dept and so they are taking my photos' now and so far so good. If you have  a wide angle they will be much better.

03/25/2008 05:10 PM by Missy Caulk-Ann Arbor- Realtor(R)- Ann Arbor Real Estate (Keller Williams-Ann Arbor)


JoELLEN:  You have an interesting situation.  The photographers that I use don't shoot nearly that many photos.  If you like to have a lot to choose from, then this might not be as cost-effective as you think, unless of course, you can hook up with one that will give you more time.  My appointments generally take about a half hour to 45 minutes.  I found my photographer through the tour company (Obeo).  Thanks for your comment, JoEllen.

MICHAEL:  Even though I purchased a digital camera with a wide angle lense, it doesn't even come close to the professional when it comes to capturing a room.  You are right about how expensive it would be to start getting into purchasing equipment.  My camera is just point and shoot, and while it did a pretty good job, it wasn't even in the ballpark of the professional photos.  Your point about being able to use composition is another reason why I stopped doing it on my own.  Thanks for commenting.

MELINA:  I agree.  If you're good, and you have the equipment, there is no reason not to do it yourself.  However, I can't tell you the amount of terrible photos that I see on MLS and just shake my head in disbelief.  Just this week, I saw a photo that had someone's full arm clearly in the picture.  I can't imagine that this is what the homeowner was thinking when they agreed to pay a commission to a professional.  My photographer doesn't use enhancements with photoshop, but I imagine that some might.  It's not worth it to make the home look like something that it isn't.  Thanks for your comment.

03/25/2008 06:35 PM by Adam Waldman - Long Island REALTOR® (RE/MAX Best)


Excellent presentation on the benefit of professional photos. I am actually taking a class on this in April to better my photography !

03/25/2008 07:38 PM by Crossville TN Real Estate, Melissa Grant REALTOR®, Search For Local Info Here ! (Choice Real Estate, on The Cumberland Plateau )


Great examples to illustrate your point, Adam.  I have to agree with Kelly on the cost, though.  In my area, it is a major investment.  However, many of the homes here are at a level that do warrant this expense.  I have a new point & shoot with a wide angle lens that I'm just starting to use.  It's great, but at a certain level, I would hire a professional. 

I love your point about delegating to benefit your client's best interest.  It is WISE! 

BTW -- Your listing looks great! Whoever you use is talented. 

03/25/2008 08:05 PM by Elaine Hanson, REALTOR® ~ Topanga, CA Real Estate Specialist (Pritchett-Rapf & Assoc. Realtors, Topanga)


Very true. Ive often referred to that as agent for sale by owner syndrome.  Its when agents do their own fsbo work because they think they will save money.....we all know fsbos could have great service and results by using a Realtor.  Realtors could have great service and results by hiring professionals too.  Way to go!

03/25/2008 10:16 PM by Utah Dave and Utah Homes for Sale (Robison & Company Real Estate)


You already know how I feel about photography!  Pictures are worth 1,000 words...do you want to look at something that speaks highly about your property or at something that speaks very poorly???  This is an awesome post Adam.

03/25/2008 11:00 PM by Shannon Lefevre Naples, Florida CRS (John R. Wood REALTORS Inc.)


Hi Adam: While I'm not a professional photographer I do have very nice camera equipment and get compliments on my photos and virtual tours all the time.  However, I do agree that many agents take VERY poor quality photos of their listings.  Some agents are getting paid a full commission and only inlcuding one photo of their listings on the MLS. There are a few agents in our area that don't even have an exterior photo of their listings on the MLS after they have been on the market 30 days or longer!  I would be outraged if I were their seller client!!

If I were doing business in a higher average price range market I would consider using a professional photographer though.

03/25/2008 11:13 PM by Cheryl Powell - ABR, Broker, Realtor - Remax Gold - Concord NC Real Estate (RE/MAX Gold - The Powell Team)


Adam, this is exactly why it is SO important to have a team of people around you. Make it beneficial for everyone involved. I would make it a point to partner with a great photographer, landscaper, stager etc. Thanks for this post Adam, it really opened my eyes to the difference a picture can make!

To your success,

Susan

03/25/2008 11:45 PM by Susan Davis, Realtor~Van Buren, Fort Smith, AR Real Estate (Exit Realty Fort Smith)


I use a pro for virtual tours, but take my own still pictures.  I think I do a good job when buyers come out to a listing and say.... "it looks better in the pictures".

03/25/2008 11:55 PM by Georgina M. Hunter R(S) e-Pro Maui Real Estate Sales (Jim Sanders Realty Inc. - Maui)


Oddly enough, I take my own photos because I'm quite good at it. If I run into a situation where things aren't working well, I wouldn't hesitate to yell for help.

03/25/2008 11:58 PM by Ruthmarie Hicks (Keller Williams Realty)


Duly noted! Your example photos tell a powerful story! Thanks for making me think twice about this!

03/26/2008 12:04 AM by Kirk Westervelt - Greenville, SC Realtor (Keller Williams)


Adam,  You have done a great job proving your point.  A picture is worth a 1000 words.  (and a few dollars, too)  Congratulations on another feature.  

03/26/2008 12:10 AM by Phoenix Arizona Real Estate ~ Doreen McPherson (Keller Williams Arizona Realty ~ Scottsdale ~ Tempe)


Adam, I have never hired out photos but will consider it if mine look like - um - well you know. It does make a difference and if you don't have a wide angle lens for your camera there is no way you can take a good photo in my honest opinion. I wonder what it costs here. I wonder if you could contact a photography school or college class and work something out? Idea? maybe?

03/26/2008 12:22 AM by Jo Soss | Bremerton WA Real Estate (Skyline Properties, Inc.)


Good information!  I always use a professional photographer and a virtual tour.  My photographer does a great job and always captures the room sizes and the photos are natural looking.  My sellers always get a copy of the Virtual Tour.  They love it!  I never put pictures on the MLS that are not exactly what the house and property look like.  I use temporary pictures until the photographer is available.  I'm not that good, but at least I have pictures until the professional gets there!

03/26/2008 12:29 AM by Diane Lombardino (Bluffs Real Estate)


Unless you have a wide-angle lens, I would get a professional. Your seller's will appreciate the results. Also the pros have value added services like videos, virtual tours, photo-click monitoring etc. etc. It's not just about photos any more!

03/26/2008 12:38 AM by Garreth Wilcock: Central East Austin Real Estate (The Pinnacle Group at Keller Williams)


I agree with you about hiring a professional photographer. If a seller makes a decent effort to prepare the home for sale, I'll do it.  The cost isn't prohibitive here, usually it's well under $200. 

Some are better than others. And then there are some photographers that make the home look as brilliant as an oil painting, and when you drive up to the house you're like, "Waitasecond, what's the address? Are we at the right place...'cause...this looks nothing like the picture".  In a bad way.

03/26/2008 01:16 AM by Burien, WA Real Estate - Lisa Bosques, Assoc. Broker/Mktg Specialist (Prudential Northwest Realty Associates LLC)


What a huge improvement! I guarantee that pros won't take pictures with the toilet seat up also. (Something I see far too often on the MLS!)

03/26/2008 01:25 AM by Todd & Danielle Millar (Glenn Simon Inc.)


great post, thanks for taking the time to outline your point so well, photos are the key to allowing the internet to wede out uninterested buyers.

03/26/2008 02:10 AM by Michael Leznik - Los Angeles REALTOR and Neighborhood Expert (Keller Williams - Sherman Oaks / Encino)


Adam- I was on our MLS yesterday and came accross a listing and the main photo was a photo THROUGH A SCREEN!!!  IT was horrible.  For those that still dont want to delegate, I have seen some great posts lately about certain cameras that do a "professional" job as long as the user learns how to use it!!

Good illustrations. I had a comment on my post this morning about one of "my" listings and the lack of quality in "my" photos.  I deleted it because it is a company listing and it does not represent MY work.  I should have printed out the comment for the agent to see what the public thinks of her photos but didn't think of it until I already hit the delete key.  Consumers are looking at the photos when thinking about hiring you to sell their home.... or not.

03/26/2008 04:58 AM by Kim Carpenter-Lake Winnipesaukee REALTOR -Lake Winnipesaukee Real Estate, NH (Coldwell Banker)


I use a professional photographer as I believe it makes a difference with lighting. Interior shots can be difficult to take and it is our job to showcase the home in the best light.

03/26/2008 05:11 AM by Sharon Paxson (Prudential California Realty)


There are times when a professional photographers can make a difference, but my husband takes my pictures and uses Adobe Photoshop to edit - frankly they arevery acceptable,  Karen

03/26/2008 05:50 AM by Karen Kruschka - Fairfax Prince William Stafford County VA Real Estate Service (RE/MAX Allegiance)


Some people just won't disrupt their home and make the general changes to make it more attractive. Some people think they are not living in a cluttered mess but they fail to realize that the buyer might think otherwise.

03/26/2008 06:20 AM by Neal Bloom-Realtor ® Assoc.-CRS-Weston FL (RE/MAX Premier Associates)


Adam - great examples above!  If you don't have a knack for photography whether it be lighting, spatial relation, depth, etc then please hire someone that does.  Pictures make all the difference in the world!  I take too many pics sometimes.  HAHA  There is always a different angle and homes look different during different times of the day.  I have stood on chairs, crouched down on my knees, twisted around banisters, you name it!

03/26/2008 06:33 AM by Leesa L. Finley, REALTOR® Wake Forest NC Homes (Circa Properties)


I agree that in some cases the pictures I've seen on some web-sites are just terrible.  On the other hand..I was in corporate and group travel for 20 years and I also know that pictures can cover up a trail of tears!  I do think it's made me think that maybe on my higher end homes I will use a professional photographer.     

03/26/2008 06:36 AM by Barbara Dougher (Coldwell Banker United East Texas Division)


Having a professional photographer makes all the difference in the world...especially if it's staged correctly.  However, I must admit that not all photographers can take great photos of real estate.  I have a friend who does portraits and action shots.  She is amazing, but the real estate photos were just ok.  I did much better with the right camera and lens.  The point and shoots should be for quick reference and vacations only!

03/26/2008 06:41 AM by Cree Quaker - Ulster County Real Estate (Barqua Real Estate & Design, LLC)


Adam - I agree with your point about telling potential clients that you will use a professional photographer.   And to drive that point home, I'm sure you show your "before" and "after" photos - what a difference. 

03/26/2008 06:47 AM by Stanton Homes - Penny Hull: Raleigh Area Custom Home Builder (Stanton Homes Inc - Raleigh Custom Homes)


Adam,  Good point as I have just thought about it and can't think of one customer I have worked with who told me that the picture didn't show the true size of the room. 

Have a Fabulous Real Estate Day!

Anona

03/26/2008 07:36 AM by Anona Large-Oak Ridge, TN Real Estate (Realty Executives Associates)


Hi Adam,

Great blog and great analogy with FSBOs.

I’ve heard a few agents claim that a professional photographer doesn’t always capture the key selling features of the home, and that they can do it better. But I think that’s just a simple matter of being there when the photographer shoots, and directing them.

Again, great post.


03/26/2008 07:43 AM by Michael Cole (CPG Tours)


Adam ~ Nice post!  Thanks for the mention!  Your professional pictures look - well - professional! 

03/26/2008 08:30 AM by Kathy Passarette, L.I. Staging/Decorating (Creative Home Expressions)


That's the first time I've seen this point made by using side-by-side.  Great way of making your message more effective! 

03/26/2008 08:47 AM by Kent Simpson REALTOR®, CNS®, AHS®, RECS® (with The Pepper Group™ Diversified Real Estate)


It is very helpful to view the photos side by side. Just looking at the ones on the left, one could make the argument they are "good enough."  But after you see the professional photos, there's a huge difference.

03/26/2008 08:49 AM by Diane Bell, Hilton Head Real Estate, Bluffton (Charter 1 Real Estate, Hilton Head, Bluffton, SC)


This is real pet peeve of mine.  I always use a professional photographer, no matter what price range.  Great job.  I love the side-by-side comparisons

03/26/2008 08:59 AM by Lake Norman Real Estate ~ Diane Aurit (RE/MAX at the Lake)


Adam,

Great article.  I assist with online marketing and advertising and am amazed that many do not realize how important photographs have become in the industry.  Online advertising and the attraction to this by shoppers is the ability to experience the property from their PC.  Just as a great onsite staging presentation is extremely important, so is the online presentation.

As you know, taking photos in houses and properties is not an easy thing.  Lighting, angles, perspectives, focus, etc. are all key factors when taking photos.  Eventhough I am pretty comfortable with taking photos, there are times I recommend that a professional be brought in when I just am not getting the output I think does justice for the property and the owner.  I've crammed myself in corners, got up on ladders, taken numerous photos in my own house playing with various setting and writing them down to get certain pictures just right (i.e. the whiteout and darkness effect which happens at windows, etc.), but sometimes it just doesn't happen. At that point a pro should be called because photoshop is great but it can only do so much when the original is really poor.

Great examples too which turly show the challenges with the sky, lighting in windows, the impact of quality, etc.

03/26/2008 09:29 AM by BW


What these agents are lacking is a wide angle lens. Just that alone could change some of the above photos. Second comes taking shots at the right time of day so your natural light is maximized. A little education can go along way to taking great photos so agents can learn to take great photos. Most professional photographers cost a minimum of $500 here in the Twin Cities so using them for lower priced listing may not be cost effective.

Now you can go the OBEO route, which might cost you around $150 and have a photographer come out, but most of the time these photographers are in and out in 30 minutes, and the photos are not as great as one that might spend four hours in the home.  But for some agents that don't have time to photograph a listing, this could be an easy way to get the job done.

03/26/2008 09:29 AM by Jennifer Kirby, the Luxury Agent (Exit Realty Ventures)


Those photos really showcase the difference.  I use a photographer any time i can, since mine are good but theirs are better.  And aren't we trying to make for a value-added experience? 

03/26/2008 09:32 AM by Leigh Brown Charlotte NC Broker/Owner (RE/MAX Signature Properties)


Adam - We use a Nikon D70s. Hired a pro photographer to teach us how to use it. We take a good picture... sometimes. We still use a pro photographer for homes that require a lighting package to shoot properly. And that is much of the time.

best 

03/26/2008 09:36 AM by Gary Bolen (CRS) Lake Tahoe Real Estate Information (Dickson Realty - South Lake Tahoe)


That would be great to hire a pro to take a photo, but who has that kind of money?

03/26/2008 09:47 AM by Brian Kreick (Kreick, Inc.)


Your comparison photos are quite telling.   And the  comments that  are saying photos are so important are right - the photos play such a huge role in getting the buyers into the homes in the first place.  

03/26/2008 09:51 AM by Steve Scheer - Denver Real Estate - Highlands Ranch Real Estate (RE/MAX Masters, Inc.)


 

Adam!

A very necessary and relevant post - it is affordable and possible for Realtors to use professional photographers. Great images are important - you also need a place to put them where you will get a million visitors a month-gee, where would that be?;-]

The market demands this-consumers run from a bad experience. Eight out of ten buyers are on line. You have to put your marketing and your money where they buyer is.

Blog on!

Steve

 

03/26/2008 09:51 AM by Obeoman Steven Stearns (www.obeo.com)


Adam - Great Photos are a necessity...  I've written a couple of posts about photo quality and the lack of it.  I always have a pro take the picture, I don't understand how you can be a professional and not surround yourself with people who support you.  A professional photographer is a must!

03/26/2008 11:20 AM by Debbie Summers - Move To Lake Mary! (RE/MAX Central - Florida)


Agreed if a person has trouble taking pictures then get a professional, but we used to use a professional and we stopped. Reason being we have a lot more control over the outcome when we handle the photos ourselves. If using a photographer and they come and the day or time is not the best because of the weather or despite telling the owner to pick up the house, there is still a few things that need attention that the photographer does not want to wait for -- we found that doing it ourselves was the best. If the weather is less than wonderful and there are some clouds, we can go back again and re-shoot. And if there is a few things to pick up, we just handle it and the photographer is not thumping their fingers and annoyed that things are not all ready. But if photography is not an agent's skill set then by all means hire a professional. Our 2 cents.

03/26/2008 11:29 AM by Bob & Carolin Benjamin - E Phoenix Arizona Real Estate (Benjamin Realty LLC)


I like what Bob & Carolin said...I am now with a small brokerage - we do our own photography and if I want to have a professional come in, its at my expense. When I was with large brokerage, we had someone doing the photography - but it wasn't all that good and he didn't come back if there was a problem.  The result was that I ended up redoing the photos myself! They paid for the photographer, and he was probably great for some, but I had some tricky shots that needed to be done. 

Given my 50:50 split and the fact that commissions have been under heavy downward pressure  there is a real limit on how often I can afford to call in a professional. I'm pretty good with a camera - although I have to get a better wide angle lens. It's on my wish list, but for now I have to make do. 

03/26/2008 01:39 PM by Ruthmarie Hicks (Keller Williams Realty)


I can definetly relate to this post...

03/26/2008 02:50 PM by Mike Jackson (Realty World Global)


Great post!  There are some really terrible photos in our MLS.  In addition, some agents only put one photo in MLS.  They are doing their clients a huge disservice.  There are the occasional listings that are in really bad shape and do not warrant additional pictures, but this is not typical.  I think that Sellers should also review the pictures of their homes before the listing is submitted to see if they are happy.

03/26/2008 03:03 PM by Sarah Berger (R.J. Smith Realty)


I would have to disagree with Sarah about getting seller approval on the pictures.  Sometimes this might be a good idea, but other times sellers will drive you crazy trying to micromanage this aspect... especially a "nutty" seller.

03/26/2008 03:17 PM by Georgina M. Hunter R(S) e-Pro Maui Real Estate Sales (Jim Sanders Realty Inc. - Maui)


I am always shocked whenever I look at photos on the MLS. Without any exception, there is always a listing without any photos (come on, even a camera phone shot to start off with?!) or with photos that are very "amateur" looking.
I use a photography service for my listings. They come out, take great pictures and make a photo tour of them. I have followed the photographer around with my camera and have compared my photos to theirs, and there's no comparison. There's look so much better and more professional.
I love the listings with great pictures that "walk" you through the house with the imagery and the captions. On the flip side of the coin, though, I hate it when the pictures look really great and you get to the house and it's nowhere close to being as nice as the pictures!

03/26/2008 05:24 PM by Ravinder Pilson - Dilbeck GMAC Real Estate in Santa Clarita, CA (Dilbeck GMAC Real Estate)


There is a listing in our MLS that shows the dining room into the kitchen.  The dining room table is covered with papers including what looks like the listing contract. The kitchen counter has dishes on it.  Imagine putting that in MLS??

03/26/2008 05:39 PM by Monika McGillicuddy~NH Real Estate Broker (Prudential Verani Realty)


Adam - Great post. I came across a listing in our MLS yesterday with the photographer's finger on the left side of the photo. To make matters worse, the photo was taken from within the driver's side of the car as you could see the side mirror's edge on the right side of the photo. I can't make this stuff up!

Learned long ago that my virtual tour photographer was worth every penny I paid him. I take good pictures but they pale in comparison to his.

03/26/2008 06:16 PM by Kim Skumanick, Northeast PA REALTOR (Lewith & Freeman Real Estate)


Adam, I have always taken my own photos.  I know I am pretty good at it, but not a professional.  I usually take 100 to 200 photos of a house.  Many of the same shots a few times and from different angles to make sure I have the best photo. The cost is one factor, the other is time schedule.  The company in my area is booked and it can be difficult to have this done on MY time.  However, your comparison has me thinking I might need to investigate having a professional. 

03/26/2008 06:53 PM by Audrey June-Forshey, GRI, Gaithersburg, MD (RE/MAX Realty Group)


I read several comments above and i agree with the sentiment of the cost of hiring a professional photographer. That would be very nice to do so but sometimes the budget is not there for one. Now if the average sales were around 3-4 homes per month that would be an entirely different situation. but the pictures you showed above are fantastic.

03/26/2008 07:10 PM by Robert L. Brown~Grand Rapids Real Estate Flexit Realty, West Michigan (www.mrbrownsellsgr.com)


I haven't used a professional photographer for the homes I have listed... but I used to be one.  I do however agree that there are things we can do and things that are better left to others.  I don't stage. 

03/26/2008 10:59 PM by Lane Bailey - REALTOR & Car Guy (Diamond Dwellings Realty)


Adam:  WOW, what a thought-provoking post--I don't know whether my listing that I just added is good enough now!!  Seriously, if I take poor photos, I will call the professional but, I have a wide-angle lens and think they're okay!  Sometimes I show the marketing proofs to the Seller and let them know that I'll get the professional out that afternoon if they would prefer.  I've only had one client request that I hire the professional; then, when the photos were sent to us, the guy asked if we could use mine because they were 'brighter'!! 

03/26/2008 11:06 PM by Debe Maxwell (Helen Adams Realty)


I took a few photography classes in high school and college.  As a mater of fact, I still have my dads old darkroom equipment in the basement.  Does that help show my age?  For top price listings with an incredible feature that I don't think I can captures, I would hire out.  Let me tell you what I saw in our real estate book today.  The main photo of a listing in an ad was of the stove.  Now, this isn't a expensive home and if the best part of it is the stove, I don't think I'd even want to go there!

03/27/2008 01:58 AM by Jennifer Hartwick (Coldwell Banker Tatie Payne, Inc.)


There are so many listings without any photos or camera phone pictures.  I take my own, but use both standard and a wide angle lens and try to get them under the best lighting.  The biggest challenge many times is getting the home in the best condition for the pictures.

03/27/2008 04:37 AM by Randy L. Prothero - Hawaii REALTOR® (Century 21 Liberty Homes)


Adam -Wow looks like you struck a chord. 

I saw several recommendations for good deals, here is the one that produces a video, tour and flyers, photographs and can measure the floorplan - www.floorplanonline.com around $200 per avg size listing.

03/27/2008 07:58 AM by Chris Drayer (FloorPlanOnline)


Adam:

This is a great post and so well stated. It is well worth the investment to get professionals invovled when possible. We can also do a better job of helping our clients stage their homes for sale.

03/27/2008 11:01 PM by Alan Kirkpatrick Austin Texas Real Estate (Austin Texas Homes)